Matt Kuhar vs Andres Valentin Ispas Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Nov at 07:15 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Kuhar vs A. Valentin Ispas

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CAN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kuhar 1 - 0 Ispas
They have played 2 sets in total, with Matt Kuhar winning 2 and Andres Valentin Ispas winning 0. The last match between Matt Kuhar and Andres Valentin Ispas was at the M25 Montreal, 03-11-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: I.hard, with Matt Kuhar getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kuhar | 1 |
| Ispas | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) M25 Montreal(11-03-25)
M. Kuhar vs A. V. Ispas H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.50% (106-85) | Career Total W/L | 42.86% (6-8) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Kuhar vs A. V. Ispas Match Preview:
- Does Matt Kuhar have a strong recent second serve? His win rate for points on his second serve is 43.50%, whereas Andres Valentin Ispas has a slightly higher rate at 46.67%.
- Considering return games, how well are the players performing? Matt Kuhar excels in winning opponent’s second serve points at 48.40%, outpacing Andres Valentin Ispas who sits at 43.75%.
- When looking at first serve return points, Matt Kuhar significantly leads with a 31.20% win rate compared to Ispas's 12.50%, pointing to a stronger return game.
- Who performs better under pressure? Andres Valentin Ispas saves breakpoints at a rate of 57.14%, higher than Kuhar’s 43.41%, showcasing resilience in tense situations.
- Analyzing overall match success, Kuhar's win rate of 48.98% is slightly weaker than Ispas's 50.00% over the past year, indicating a slightly more consistent performance by Ispas.
- Which surface favors each player? Kuhar and Ispas both have their best win percentage on indoor hard courts at 57%, but Ispas shows larger versatility with comparable performance on different surfaces.
- In terms of experience, Kuhar has faced competitors with an average rank of 60.61, while Ispas's opponents are unranked, suggesting that Kuhar might have faced tougher competition.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Ispas has the edge as he has won 67% of deciding sets, compared to Kuhar's 40% success rate in similar scenarios.
Editorial Prediction (November 3, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match presents contrasting styles and strengths between Matt Kuhar and Andres Valentin Ispas. Kuhar has shown promise in return games, particularly his dominance in first serve returns. However, his opponent, Ispas, exhibits a slight edge in handling pressure situations, notably in saving breakpoints.
Surface performance analyses reveal both players favor indoor hard courts, suggesting a level playing field in that respect. Ispas has displayed consistency in decisive matches, which could be crucial if the game is closely contested.
While Kuhar has been facing relatively stronger opponents, Ispas's ability to maintain a slightly better overall win rate indicates reliability. Given these dynamics, Andres Valentin Ispas appears poised to emerge as the likely victor in this encounter.
Matt Kuhar vs Andres Valentin Ispas Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Kuhar vs A. V. Ispas H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 1:13:48 | Average Match Time | 1:13:48 |
| 60% (28/47) | 1st Serve % | 40% (23/58) |
| 71% (20/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (16/23) |
| 74% (14/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (12/35) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 52% (30/58) | Return Points Win % | 28% (13/47) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Kuhar Recent Matches Played
A. V. Ispas Recent Matches Played

M. Kuhar vs A. V. Ispas Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.50% (106/85) | YTD Win/Loss | 42.86% (6/8) |
| 55.24% (237/192) | Sets Win/Loss | 42.42% (14/19) |
| 52.87% (2098/1870) | Games Win/Loss | 47.54% (164/181) |
| 57.34% (82/61) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 44.44% (8/10) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 53.57% (15/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42.86% (6/8) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 331 | Aces Total | 15 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
| 416 | Total Double Faults | 53 |
| 1:5:54 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 402.21 | Average Opponent Rank | 273.43 |
| 63% (4851/7682) | 1st Serve % | 48% (286/597) |
| 65% (3129/4851) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (196/286) |
| 46% (1314/2831) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (138/311) |
| 45% (333/742) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (23/61) |
| 40% (3128/7758) | Return Points Win % | 38% (220/574) |
| 36.36% (4/7) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.67% (102/78) | Futures W/L | 42.86% (6/8) |
| 55% (105/190) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 43% (6/14) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (17/34) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 46% (21/46) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (3/5) |
| 92% (108/99) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (6/4) |
| 8% (108/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (6/2) |
| 8% (83/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (8/2) |